Brian Sims
Editor
Brian Sims
Editor
THE INFORMATION Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has issued a £66,000 fine and a reprimand to Police Scotland for “serious failures” in the handling of sensitive personal information.
An investigation found that Police Scotland extracted the entire contents of a person’s mobile phone after they reported an alleged crime, without ensuring there were sufficient safeguards in place to prevent access to irrelevant personal information. As a result, officers collected a substantial volume of highly sensitive information, much of which had no bearing on the investigation.
Police Scotland subsequently included the full unredacted content within a misconduct disclosure bundle and shared it with a third party who should not have received it. The ICO determined that appropriate review, redaction and security procedures were not in place and that staff were neither adequately guided nor supported by effective organisational controls.
The ICO concluded that Police Scotland failed to:
*implement appropriate organisational and technical measures to ensure data security
*limit personal information sharing to what was strictly necessary
*ensure members of staff handling sensitive information were following clear guidance and procedures
*report the personal data breach to the ICO within the legally required 72‑hour timeframe
Devastating consequences
Sally-Anne Poole, the ICO’s head of investigations, commented: “At its heart, data protection is about people. This incident is a stark example of the devastating consequences of poor data protection practices on individuals.”
Poole continued: “Police Scotland failed in its obligation to safeguard the personal information of someone who had reached out to them for help. Instead, they exposed that person to further risk and distress by disclosing highly sensitive information to a third party.”
Further, Poole noted: “People should be able to trust that organisations will treat their personal information with care, fairness and respect. When organisations fail to do so, they can expect enforcement action from us.”
In assessing the fine amount, the ICO considered the seriousness of the incident, the sensitivity of the data involved and the impact on the affected individual. The ICO also considered Police Scotland’s status as a public body and reduced the penalty accordingly to avoid disproportionate impact on public services.
*Further information is available online at www.ico.org.uk
Western Business Media Limited
Dorset House
64 High Street
East Grinstead
RH19 3DE
UNITED KINGDOM